Case Studies
Case Study Number 2
 
Summary
The purpose of this project was to reduce cost and throughput time as well as improve accuracy of the product.  The major customer was complaining about the length of time it took to get their product, and the backlog of work was large and growing.  Over the course of this project, an assessment was conducted that guided the improvement efforts and several workshops to implement work in the organization.  The result was a dramatic increase in throughput time and a resulting decrease in the backlog.
 
Company Background
The client is a technical publishing company that has been in business since 1969. They produce an Illustrated Parts Catalog (IPC).  The IPC provides airlines, repair agencies, truck operators, and oil exploration companies with information that facilitates repair and maintenance of complex and expensive equipment. Each IPC is customized for the specific user.  There were 1,600 employees in the company with approximately half of those in the operation where these improvements took place. 
 
Project Overview
This was a fairly comprehensive project consisting of:
Executive engagement and education
Employee education on lean principles
An Assessment to understand the entire value stream and prioritize opportunities for improvement based on data
Four Improvement Workshops to introduce flow into the system and to refine and replicate that flow across the organization.
Project Team
The project team consisted of the Director of Quality, two improvement specialists, a plant manager and three of his direct reports.
 
Methodology
We used our Lean Assessment and Service Improvement methodologies. The Lean Assessment is a process that allows for a broad look across the entire value stream and takes into consideration data from various constituencies such as: Customers, Management, Employees, Competition and Strategic direction. A team of employees led by a consultant mapped the key processes (Level One and Level Two) in the value streams and collected data on process performance. Current and anticipated future strategic direction of the company, competitive threats, employee satisfaction and barriers to performance and customer priorities were documented for each process.  There were fourteen processes assessed: Engineering Parts Listing, Illustration, Training, Computer processing, Catalog Assembly, Provisioning, Order Processing, Customer Support, Computer Programming, Shipping, Micrographics, Reprographics, Production Control and Billing. This was done over a five-day period across four plants.  The data was analyzed to determine opportunities for improvement and prioritization. From this Lean Assessment the team made a recommendation to management regarding where to focus cost reduction efforts and an estimate of magnitude. The recommendations were accepted and the improvement effort was launched.  For each of the chosen areas, further definition was documented through the use of a five-day Improvement Workshop. This five-day event focused on a particular process and involved subject matter experts working in the process.  Each assigned team documented detail process steps (Level Three and Four), developed a “to-be” process map, determined changes needed and implemented those changes over the course of the workshop or shortly thereafter.
 
Project Implementation
Workshop #1 focused on the elimination of waste and the flow of work through the parts compiling, quality control and illustration processes. The workshop team established a “work cell.”  The results were dramatic and can be seen in the Results section.  Having achieved success with the first workshop, management got ready to replicate the work across the entire operation of 800 employees.  Prior to this, the employees in the initial work cell, conducted a second workshop which refined the processes further and achieved an additional 25% reduction in throughput time.
 
Results
Workshop #1
Item
Start Status
Achieved
%
Throughput time
110 days
20 days
-82%
Work-in-process
16 units/employee
5 units/employee
-69%
Travel distance
3,542 feet
139 feet
-96%
Number of process steps
78
27
-65%
Number of handoffs
21
4
-81%

Management reorganized the entire operation into work cells. Additional workshops established and implemented a roll-out plan. Over one weekend, 600 employees in two of three buildings were rearranged into work cells. Two weeks later a smaller group of people was also rearranged. Overall throughput time was reduced from 110 days to 8 days. 
The following table displays the results in direct labor hours reduction after implementation.  There was an 85% reduction in average direct labor hours used per unit of raw material consumed.
Microsoft Excel Worksheet
Lessons Learned
All layers of the company must feel ownership of final plan for it to have lasting success.  Specifically, top leadership needs to participate in the improvement effort in visible ways and needs to and remove obstacles as they arise.  Follow-up is critical to document and
adapt new activities. 


Contact Rowney Consulting

Rowney Consulting
10910 S. Bremer Road
Canby, OR 97013-6705

Phone: 503-266-5492
Fax: 503-266-3610
Cell: 503-989-1897
Email: mike@rowneyconsulting.com


| Home | Lean |E-Commerce | Competitiveness | Tools |
| Allocate & Manage Products | Leadership & Direction | Case Studies | Bios |

For help with this website contact: mike@rowneyconsulting.com

Copyright © 2000 Rowney Consulting Inc.

Designed by One Dog Designs